U.S. v. Solache-Valle, 4:18CR3014. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180315e33
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 15). As explained by counsel, Defendant cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 15), is granted. 2) Defendant's status hearing will be held before the
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 15). As explained by counsel, Defendant cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 15), is granted. 2) Defendant's status hearing will be held before the ..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 15). As explained by counsel, Defendant cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 15), is granted.
2) Defendant's status hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 11, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.. Defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing.
3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing Defendant's status hearing outweigh the best interest of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and April 11, 2018, shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
