Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Giles, 8:06CR116. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180326960 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAURIE SMITH CAMP , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Notice of Appeal, ECF No. 993, which the Court will also construe as a Motion for Certificate of Appealability; the Defendant's Motion for Leave to appeal in forma pauperis, ECF No. 997; and the Defendant's Motion for Status Update, ECF No. 999. The Defendant seeks to appeal from the Memorandum and Order, ECF No. 985, and Judgment, ECF No. 986, denying his "Motion for Reconsideratio
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Notice of Appeal, ECF No. 993, which the Court will also construe as a Motion for Certificate of Appealability; the Defendant's Motion for Leave to appeal in forma pauperis, ECF No. 997; and the Defendant's Motion for Status Update, ECF No. 999.

The Defendant seeks to appeal from the Memorandum and Order, ECF No. 985, and Judgment, ECF No. 986, denying his "Motion for Reconsideration," construed as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody ("§ 2255 motion"), ECF No. 980. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 governs the Defendant's ability to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal. Before the Defendant may appeal the denial of his § 2255 motion, however, a "Certificate of Appealability" must issue. Pursuant to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 ("AEDPA"), the right to appeal the denial of a § 2255 motion is governed by the certificate of appealability requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) provides that a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right:

(c)(1) Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from— . . . . (B) the final order in a proceeding under section 2255. (2) A certificate of appealability may issue under paragraph (1) only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (3) The certificate of appealability under paragraph (1) shall indicate which specific issue or issues satisfy the showing required by paragraph (2).

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

A "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" requires a demonstration "that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were `adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4 (1983)).

The issues raised in the § 2255 motion were carefully considered. For the reasons set forth in the Court's previously issued Memorandum and Order, ECF 985, denying the Defendant's § 2255 motion, the Court concludes that the Defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Defendant's Notice of Appeal, construed as a Motion for Certificate of Appealability, ECF No. 993, is denied; 2. The Defendant's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal, ECF No. 997, is denied; 3. The Defendant's Motion for Status Update, ECF No. 999, is denied as moot; and 4. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Defendant at his last known address.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer