U.S. v. Fawehinmi, 8:17CR166. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180501a69
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue [39]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 61-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by June 27, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Continue [39] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 27, 2018. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue [39]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 61-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by June 27, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Continue [39] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 27, 2018. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue [39]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 61-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by June 27, 2018.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Continue [39] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 27, 2018.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between April 27, 2018 and June 27, 2018 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
