Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Parsons, 4:17CR3038. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180531c44 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has filed a pro se motion to dismiss. (Filing No. 116). Defendant is represented by an attorney, and any arguments as to the case merits must be made by and through his attorney. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Pending further order of the court, the government need not respond to Defendant's pro se motion to dismiss, (Filing No. 116). 2) Defendant's attorney shall confer with Defendant, and if following those discussions, they believe
More

ORDER

Defendant has filed a pro se motion to dismiss. (Filing No. 116). Defendant is represented by an attorney, and any arguments as to the case merits must be made by and through his attorney.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Pending further order of the court, the government need not respond to Defendant's pro se motion to dismiss, (Filing No. 116).

2) Defendant's attorney shall confer with Defendant, and if following those discussions, they believe the court must address the arguments presented in Defendant's pro se motion to dismiss, Defendant's attorney shall raise the arguments in a formal motion to dismiss signed and filed by Defendant's attorney.

3) If on or before June 8, 2018, Defendant's attorney has not filed the motion to dismiss on Defendant's behalf, the pro se motion will be denied without further notice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer