U.S. v. Vasser, 8:17CR372. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180601e47
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 31, 2018
Latest Update: May 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57]. Counsel is seeking additional time to find a mutually acceptable resolution to this matter. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 5, 2018, is continued to July 10, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57]. Counsel is seeking additional time to find a mutually acceptable resolution to this matter. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 5, 2018, is continued to July 10, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57]. Counsel is seeking additional time to find a mutually acceptable resolution to this matter. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [57] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for June 5, 2018, is continued to July 10, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 10, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
