U.S. v. Sewell, 8:17CR353. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180612a77
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [39]. Defendant requires more time to consult with and retain suitable experts to assist him with the preparation and presentation of his defense. Defendant's investigator requires additional time to locate and interview witnesses. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [39] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for July 2, 2018, i
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [39]. Defendant requires more time to consult with and retain suitable experts to assist him with the preparation and presentation of his defense. Defendant's investigator requires additional time to locate and interview witnesses. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [39] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for July 2, 2018, is..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [39]. Defendant requires more time to consult with and retain suitable experts to assist him with the preparation and presentation of his defense. Defendant's investigator requires additional time to locate and interview witnesses. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [39] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for July 2, 2018, is continued to September 4, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and September 4, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
