U.S. v. Gathercole, 4:17CR3096. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180619a71
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for June 25, 2018. (Filing No. 51). Defendant's newly appointed counsel needs additional time to review discovery and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. The court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 51), is granted. 2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before August 17, 2018. 3) T
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for June 25, 2018. (Filing No. 51). Defendant's newly appointed counsel needs additional time to review discovery and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. The court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 51), is granted. 2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before August 17, 2018. 3) Th..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue the trial currently set for June 25, 2018. (Filing No. 51). Defendant's newly appointed counsel needs additional time to review discovery and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. The court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 51), is granted.
2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before August 17, 2018.
3) The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Senior United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on September 17, 2018, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of ten (10) trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
4) Based upon the representations of counsel, the Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by continuing the trial; and that the purposes served by continuing the trial date in this case outweigh the interest of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and September 17, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1), (h)(6) & (h)(7). Failing to object to this order as provided under the court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle