Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Medina, 8:18CR152. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180730d28 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES [132]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by October 1, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES [132] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before October 1, 2018. 2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such m
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES [132]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 60-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by October 1, 2018.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES [132] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before October 1, 2018.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between today's date, and October 1, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer