U.S. v. Valenzuela, 8:18CR20. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180809b77
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [21]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 45-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 24, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [21] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 24, 201
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [21]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 45-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 24, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [21] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 24, 2018..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [21]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 45-day extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by September 24, 2018.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [21] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before September 24, 2018.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between August 7, 2018 and September 24, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
