U.S. v. Ramos, 8:17CR127. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180904b20
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [71]. Counsel needs additional time as defendant has an on-going medical condition and is unable to attend trial currently. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [71] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for September 11, 2018 is continued to November 27, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court f
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [71]. Counsel needs additional time as defendant has an on-going medical condition and is unable to attend trial currently. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [71] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for September 11, 2018 is continued to November 27, 2018. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court fi..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [71]. Counsel needs additional time as defendant has an on-going medical condition and is unable to attend trial currently. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [71] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for September 11, 2018 is continued to November 27, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and November 27, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
