U.S. v. Rosenblatt, 4:18CR3023. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180917b57
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defense counsel has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 14). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 14), is granted. 2) Defendant's status hearing will be held before the undersig
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defense counsel has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 14). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 14), is granted. 2) Defendant's status hearing will be held before the undersign..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defense counsel has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 14). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 14), is granted.
2) Defendant's status hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on October 24, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing.
3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing Defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and October 24, 2018 shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
