U.S. v. Miyamoto, 8:18CR214. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180928f95
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue Pretrial Motion Deadline [17] as amended by [18]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 1-month extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by October 25, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline [17] as amended by [18] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before Oc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue Pretrial Motion Deadline [17] as amended by [18]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 1-month extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by October 25, 2018. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline [17] as amended by [18] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before Oct..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue Pretrial Motion Deadline [17] as amended by [18]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 1-month extension. Pretrial motions shall be filed by October 25, 2018.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Extend Pretrial Motion Deadline [17] as amended by [18] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before October 25, 2018.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between today's date and October 25, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
