U.S. v. Reichert, 8:17CR303. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20181002l18
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37]. The parties are attempting in good faith to resolve this matter short of a trial and Counsel seeks additional time to find a mutually acceptable resolution to the case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for October 2, 2018, is continued to November 6, 2
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37]. The parties are attempting in good faith to resolve this matter short of a trial and Counsel seeks additional time to find a mutually acceptable resolution to the case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for October 2, 2018, is continued to November 6, 20..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37]. The parties are attempting in good faith to resolve this matter short of a trial and Counsel seeks additional time to find a mutually acceptable resolution to the case. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [37] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for October 2, 2018, is continued to November 6, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and November 6, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
