Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Siemers v. BNSF Railway Company, 8:17CV360. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20181119b34 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . On May 4, 2018, this Court issued an order stating, in part, that information produced in response to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 14 could not, absent further court order, be used in connection with any other lawsuit or litigation. ( Filing No. 45. ) Plaintiff has now requested that the Court grant him leave to use a document produced by Defendant in response to Request for Production No. 14 in a case pending in the District Court of Lan
More

ORDER

On May 4, 2018, this Court issued an order stating, in part, that information produced in response to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 14 could not, absent further court order, be used in connection with any other lawsuit or litigation. (Filing No. 45.)

Plaintiff has now requested that the Court grant him leave to use a document produced by Defendant in response to Request for Production No. 14 in a case pending in the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. The document at issue is an Employee Injury Report, which bears the bates number BNSF 001680. Defendant does not object to this request, but states that it does not admit or concede that the document is admissible in the Lancaster County case.

Having considered the matter,

IT IS ORDERED that the Employee Injury Report, bates numbered BNSF 001680, may be used in connection with the Rohr case pending in the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer