Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Ibarra-Mendez, 4:18CR3157. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20181204b09 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has requested a change of plea hearing, and consents to having the hearing conducted before the undersigned magistrate judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The status conference currently scheduled for December 5, 2018 is cancelled. 2) Defendant's request to set a change of plea hearing is granted. This case, insofar as it concerns this defendant, is removed from the trial docket based upon the request of Defendant. 3) A hearing on
More

ORDER

Defendant has requested a change of plea hearing, and consents to having the hearing conducted before the undersigned magistrate judge.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) The status conference currently scheduled for December 5, 2018 is cancelled. 2) Defendant's request to set a change of plea hearing is granted. This case, insofar as it concerns this defendant, is removed from the trial docket based upon the request of Defendant. 3) A hearing on Defendant's anticipated plea of guilty is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Zwart on December 4, 2018, at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom No. 2, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska. 4) Defendant, defense counsel, and counsel for the government shall appear at this hearing. 5) On or before the date set for the plea proceeding, counsel for the government and for Defendant shall provide to the assigned probation officer their respective versions of the offense for purposes of preparing the presentence investigation report. 6) The ends of justice served by granting Defendant's request to set a change of plea hearing outweigh the interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial, and the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be deemed excluded in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act because the failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer