Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp., 8:10-cv-00187-JFB-CRZ. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20181207e18
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION SETTING PROCESS FOR DESIGNATING PRIOR TESTIMONY FOR USE AT TRIAL JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . In accordance with Nebraska Civil Rule 7.1(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively "the parties"), through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and jointly move the Court for an order setting forth the following schedule for designating and resolving disputes regarding deposition testimony and 2015 trial testimony for use at the trial scheduled t
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION SETTING PROCESS FOR DESIGNATING PRIOR TESTIMONY FOR USE AT TRIAL JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . In accordance with Nebraska Civil Rule 7.1(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively "the parties"), through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and jointly move the Court for an order setting forth the following schedule for designating and resolving disputes regarding deposition testimony and 2015 trial testimony for use at the trial scheduled to..
More
JOINT STIPULATION SETTING PROCESS FOR DESIGNATING PRIOR TESTIMONY FOR USE AT TRIAL
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge.
In accordance with Nebraska Civil Rule 7.1(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively "the parties"), through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and jointly move the Court for an order setting forth the following schedule for designating and resolving disputes regarding deposition testimony and 2015 trial testimony for use at the trial scheduled to begin December 10, 2018:
• December 4, 2018: the parties will exchange deposition and 2015 trial transcript designations they wish to play or read to the jury for at least Messrs. Cooper, Benson, Stinson, and Marshall; the parties reserve their rights to designate additional testimony after this date, giving 4-days' notice prior to when the testimony is expected to be played or read to the jury, so as to allow time for counter-designations and objections, a meet and confer, and to raise with the Court any unresolved objections at least one day prior to playing or reading the testimony to the jury;
• December 6, 2018: the parties will exchange objections and any counter-designations to the designations exchanged by the parties;
• December 7, 2018: the parties will exchange any objections and any counter-counter designations based on the counter-designations exchanged by the parties;
• December 8, 2018: the parties will meet and confer in an attempt to resolve any disputes over objections made by the parties, and also meet and confer regarding any additional counter- or counter-counter designations;
• December 9, 2018: the parties will submit designated deposition and trial transcripts to the Court along with any unresolved objections thereto;
• December 10, 2018 (or when convenient for the Court): the parties will be prepared to argue any unresolved objections to deposition and 2015 trial transcript designations so the Court can rule on them.
For each deposition and trial transcript designated by either party, all admissible, designated and counter-designated testimony will be introduced in the sequence in which the testimony was originally given.
Any video to be played by either party should be exchanged at least two days prior to when it is expected to be played in Court, unless not feasible because the Court has not ruled on unresolved objections, in which case the video should be exchanged as soon as possible so as to allow the other party a meaningful chance to review.
Source: Leagle