Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sabata v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, 4:17-CV-3107. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20181228940 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING RECORDS OF DECEASED INMATES MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . Upon review of the parties' Joint Motion, Filing 217, and proposed Stipulated Protective Order emailed to the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers, IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of a Stipulated Protected Order is granted, and the parties' Stipulated Protective Order is entered below: HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and 45 C.F.R.
More

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING RECORDS OF DECEASED INMATES

Upon review of the parties' Joint Motion, Filing 217, and proposed Stipulated Protective Order emailed to the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of a Stipulated Protected Order is granted, and the parties' Stipulated Protective Order is entered below:

HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1), the Court finds good cause for the issuance of a qualified protective order and ORDERS as follows:

1. The parties and their attorneys are hereby authorized to receive, subpoena and transmit "protected health information" pertaining to deceased inmates to the extent and subject to the conditions outlined herein.

2. For the purposes of this qualified protective order, "protected health information" shall have the same scope and definition as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103 and 164.501. Protected health information includes, but is not limited to, health information, including demographic information, relating to either (a) the past, present, or future physical or mental condition of an individual, (b) the provision of care to an individual, or (c) the payment for care provided to an individual, which identifies the individual or which reasonably could be expected to identify the individual.

3. For the purposes of this qualified protective order, "deceased inmates" shall mean all inmates who died in NDCS custody on or after January 1, 2013.

4. All "covered entities" (as defined by 45 C.F.R. § 160.103) are hereby authorized to disclose protected health information pertaining to deceased inmates to attorneys representing the Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned litigation.

5. The parties and their attorneys shall only be permitted to use or disclose the protected health information of deceased inmates for purposes of prosecuting or defending this action including any appeals of this case. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, disclosure to their attorneys, experts, consultants, court personnel, court reporters, copy services, trial consultants, deponents, witnesses, and other entities or persons involved in the litigation process.

6. Prior to disclosing the protected health information of deceased inmates to persons involved in this litigation, counsel shall inform each such person that such protected health information may not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than this litigation. Counsel shall take all other reasonable steps to ensure that persons receiving such protected health information do not use or disclose such information for any purpose other than this litigation.

7. Within 45 days after the conclusion of the litigation including appeals, the parties, their attorneys, and any person or entity in possession of protected health information received from counsel pursuant to paragraph four of this Order, shall return the protected health information of deceased inmates to the covered entity or destroy any and all copies of protected health information pertaining to deceased inmates, except that counsel are not required to secure the return or destruction of protected health information submitted to the court. In the alternative, counsel shall protect the confidentiality of the records for so long as they are retained by counsel or maintained in the Nebraska State Archives, and shall limit further uses and disclosures of confidential information as required by this Order.

8. This Order does not control or limit the use of protected health information pertaining to deceased inmates that comes into the possession of the parties or their attorneys from a source other than a "covered entity," as that term is defined in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103.

9. Nothing in this Order authorizes counsel for the Defendants to obtain medical records or information through means other than formal discovery requests, subpoenas, depositions, pursuant to a patient authorization, or other lawful process. 10. This Order does not authorize either party to seal court filings or court proceedings. The Court will make a good cause determination for filing under seal if and when the parties seek to file the protected health information of deceased inmates under seal. PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INMATE INDIVIDUAL FILES Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-178, the Court finds good cause for the issuance of a protective order and ORDERS as follows:

11. The parties and their attorneys are hereby authorized to receive, subpoena and transmit Nebraska Department of Correctional Services "individual files" pertaining to deceased inmates to the extent and subject to the conditions outlined herein.

12. For the purposes of this protective order, "individual files" shall have the same scope and definition as set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-178.

13. For the purposes of this protective order, "deceased inmates" shall mean all inmates who died in NDCS custody on or after January 1, 2013.

14. The parties and their attorneys shall only be permitted to use or disclose the individual files of deceased inmates for purposes of prosecuting or defending this action including any appeals of this case. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, disclosure to their attorneys, experts, consultants, court personnel, court reporters, copy services, trial consultants, deponents, witnesses, and other entities or persons involved in the litigation process.

15. Prior to disclosing the individual files of deceased inmates to persons involved in this litigation, counsel shall inform each such person that such individual files may not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than this litigation. Counsel shall take all other reasonable steps to ensure that persons receiving such individual files do not use or disclose such information for any purpose other than this litigation.

16. Any person described in paragraphs 5 or 14 to whom the parties and their attorneys wish to make a disclosure must, before disclosure, be required to read the terms of this protective order and sign the Acknowledgement of Protective Order attached to this order. The parties and their attorneys must maintain a log of all individuals of all persons to whom the information is disclosed, and retain all signed Acknowledgments for the pendency of this case (including any appeals).

17. The parties are in dispute regarding the discoverability of the "presentence investigation reports" as defined by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2261, contained in inmate files. Until that dispute is resolved by further meet and confer or a ruling by the court, Defendants will segregate "presentence investigation reports" in a manner that allows them to be produced promptly if the parties so agree or the court so orders. Until that time, in the event any presentence report, or any portion thereof, is inadvertently disclosed, counsel or a party in possession of such inadvertent disclosure shall immediately notify counsel for the Defendants and either destroy such materials or return them to the disclosing party.

18. This Order does not preclude future limitations on discovery should a party seek relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Agreement to this protective order does not waive any rights of any party to assert a claim of privilege as to these or similar documents, shall not affect the right of any party to seek additional protection against the disclosure of these documents or materials, and shall not be construed to require the production of any discovery by Defendants.

19. This authorization does not govern trial or other legal proceedings. The parties shall address the court at a later date on appropriate procedures for trial and other legal proceedings.

20. The provisions of this order shall remain in full force and effect until further order of this Court.

Acknowledgement of Protective Order

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND:

I,___________________________________ [print or type full name], of ______________________ _____________________________________[print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in the case of Hannah Sabata, et al., v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al., No. 4:17-cv-03107. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is the subject of this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity, except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

Date: ______________________________________________________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: _____________________________________ Signed Name: _______________________________________________________________ Business Address: __________________________________________________________ Title/Position: ____________________________________________________________
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer