U.S. v. Lopez, 8:18CR127. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190122e02
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Omar Rodriguez Lopez' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [90]. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial or to discuss other options. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [15] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 29, 2019, is continued to March 5, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the c
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Omar Rodriguez Lopez' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [90]. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial or to discuss other options. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [15] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 29, 2019, is continued to March 5, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the co..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant Omar Rodriguez Lopez' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [90]. Counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial or to discuss other options. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [15] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 29, 2019, is continued to March 5, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 5, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
