U.S. v. Gills, 8:18CR249. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190226c88
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendants' Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [25] and [26]. The parties are attempting in good faith to resolve this matter short of trial. Counsel is seeking additional time find a mutually acceptable resolution to the case. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [25] and [26] are granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendants' Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [25] and [26]. The parties are attempting in good faith to resolve this matter short of trial. Counsel is seeking additional time find a mutually acceptable resolution to the case. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [25] and [26] are granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendants' Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [25] and [26]. The parties are attempting in good faith to resolve this matter short of trial. Counsel is seeking additional time find a mutually acceptable resolution to the case. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Unopposed Motions to Continue Trial [25] and [26] are granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for February 26, 2019, is continued to April 2, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and April 2, 2019 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
