ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Traci L. Miller's ("Miller") petition for attorney fees and costs (Filing No. 23) pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The EAJA authorizes an award of "fees and other expenses" to a "prevailing party" in a case against the United States, "unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust." Id. § 2412(d)(1)(A). An award of fees under § 2412(d) "is payable to the [prevailing] litigant and is therefore subject to a Government offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt that the litigant owes to the United States." Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010).
Based on a declaration (Filing No. 23-1) from her counsel Wes Kappelman ("Kappelman") and an itemization totaling 10.6 hours of attorney time, Miller requests $2,136.52 in attorney fees under § 2412(d) and $400 for reimbursement of the cost of the filing fee under § 2412(a). Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), does not object to an award of fees and costs in this case (Filing No. 24).
Upon careful review, the Court finds (1) Miller is a "prevailing party" under the EAJA and is eligible for an award, (2) her request is timely, (3) the Commissioner's position was not "substantially justified," and (4) no "special circumstances" exist in this case that would make an award to Miller unjust. The Court further finds that Kappelman's commitment of 10.6 hours to this case and his requested hourly rates are reasonable and supported by the record. See id. § 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii); Johnson v. Sullivan, 919 F.2d 503, 505 (8th Cir. 1990) (holding that when "an EAJA petitioner presents uncontested proof of an increase in the cost of living sufficient to justify hourly attorney's fees of more than [the amount specified in the EAJA], enhanced fees should be awarded"). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: