U.S. v. Bradley, 4:19CR3025. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190329f34
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Perez has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 28), because Defendant needs additional time to investigate this case and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant Perez's motion to continue, (Filing No. 28), is granted. 2) As to both defendants, pretrial motions and
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Perez has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 28), because Defendant needs additional time to investigate this case and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant Perez's motion to continue, (Filing No. 28), is granted. 2) As to both defendants, pretrial motions and b..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Perez has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 28), because Defendant needs additional time to investigate this case and prepare for trial. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant Perez's motion to continue, (Filing No. 28), is granted.
2) As to both defendants, pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before May 3, 2019.
3) As to both defendants, trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Senior United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on June 3, 2019, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of four (4) trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
4) The ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and as to both defendants, the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and May 3, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1), (h)(6) & (h)(7). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
