U.S. v. Corral-Aguilar, 8:18CR176. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190419j27
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [35]. Counsel is engaged in negotiations and seeks additional time to resolve this matter short of trial. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [35] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for April 23, 2019, is continued to June 25, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [35]. Counsel is engaged in negotiations and seeks additional time to resolve this matter short of trial. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [35] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for April 23, 2019, is continued to June 25, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [35]. Counsel is engaged in negotiations and seeks additional time to resolve this matter short of trial. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [35] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for April 23, 2019, is continued to June 25, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and June 25, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
