Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Streeter v. Saeilo, Inc., 4:18CV3077. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20190422c45 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2019
Summary: PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend ( Filing No. 40 ) is granted, and the Progression Order ( Filing No. 37 ) is amended as follows: 1) The deadlines for complete expert disclosures 1 for all experts expected to testify at trial for the defense, (both retained experts, ( Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) ), and non-retained experts, ( Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C) ), is May 20, 2019. 2) The deposition deadline is July 8,
More

PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED)

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend (Filing No. 40) is granted, and the Progression Order (Filing No. 37) is amended as follows:

1) The deadlines for complete expert disclosures1 for all experts expected to testify at trial for the defense, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), is May 20, 2019. 2) The deposition deadline is July 8, 2019. 3) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is July 8, 2019. 4) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is July 8, 2019. 5) Motions in limine shall be filed seven days before the pretrial conference. It is not the normal practice to hold hearings on motions in limine or to rule on them prior to the first day of trial. Counsel should plan accordingly. 6) The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order. 7) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge, including all requests for changes of trial dates. Such requests will not be considered absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require that additional time be allowed.

FootNotes


1. While treating medical and mental health care providers are generally not considered "specially retained experts," not all their opinions relate to the care and treatment of a patient. Their opinion testimony is limited to what is stated within their treatment documentation. As to each such expert, any opinions which are not stated within that expert's treatment records and reports must be separately and timely disclosed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer