Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Urrutia-Ramos, 8:19CR81. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20190513b74 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 10, 2019
Latest Update: May 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [18]. Counsel needs additional time to consult with her client regarding plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [18] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for May 13, 2019, is continued to June 17, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by
More

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [18]. Counsel needs additional time to consult with her client regarding plea negotiations. For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [18] is granted, as follows:

1. The jury trial now set for May 13, 2019, is continued to June 17, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and June 17, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer