Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bates v. Frakes, 8:18CV322. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20190522c68 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 21, 2019
Latest Update: May 21, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . This is a habeas corpus case. After this case became ripe with the completion of the briefing process, today I discovered that the Honorable James E. Doyle, IV was the state trial judge who tried Mr. Bates' criminal case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a), my impartiality might reasonably be questioned because of my recent discussions with Judge Doyle regarding a significant matter unrelated to this case. 1 IT IS ORDERED that the
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is a habeas corpus case. After this case became ripe with the completion of the briefing process, today I discovered that the Honorable James E. Doyle, IV was the state trial judge who tried Mr. Bates' criminal case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), my impartiality might reasonably be questioned because of my recent discussions with Judge Doyle regarding a significant matter unrelated to this case.1

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk's office shall randomly assign a new judge to this case and request a reassignment order from the Chief Judge. The chief pro se staff attorney will assist the judge to whom the case is reassigned if requested to do so.

FootNotes


1. When I left the practice of law in 1987, Judge Doyle was one of my law partners. That fact alone would not cause me to recuse myself. It is the recency and substance of my discussions with the judge that cause me to recuse myself.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer