U.S. v. Stine, 8:19CR126. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190607g59
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [17]. The parties are working to resolve this matter short of trial. Counsel needs additional time to communicate with the defendant who is detained some distance away. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [17] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 4, 2019, is continued to September 10,
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [17]. The parties are working to resolve this matter short of trial. Counsel needs additional time to communicate with the defendant who is detained some distance away. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [17] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 4, 2019, is continued to September 10, ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [17]. The parties are working to resolve this matter short of trial. Counsel needs additional time to communicate with the defendant who is detained some distance away. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [17] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for June 4, 2019, is continued to September 10, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and September 10, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
