U.S. v. Salcedo, 8:18CR334. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190709620
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Motion to Continue Trial [32]. Counsel for the government indicates they do not have an objection to the continuance. Counsel needs additional time to finalize plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [32] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for June 3, 2019, is continued to July 8, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the cou
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Motion to Continue Trial [32]. Counsel for the government indicates they do not have an objection to the continuance. Counsel needs additional time to finalize plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [32] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for June 3, 2019, is continued to July 8, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the cour..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Motion to Continue Trial [32]. Counsel for the government indicates they do not have an objection to the continuance. Counsel needs additional time to finalize plea negotiations. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [32] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for June 3, 2019, is continued to July 8, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 8, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
