United States v. Collins, 8:19CR68. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190710a61
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant Ervin Smith Jr.'s unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [50]. Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [50] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for July 22, 2019, is continued to September 3, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the end
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant Ervin Smith Jr.'s unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [50]. Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [50] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for July 22, 2019, is continued to September 3, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant Ervin Smith Jr.'s unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [50]. Counsel needs additional time to conclude plea negotiations. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [50] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for July 22, 2019, is continued to September 3, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and September 3, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
