Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Corporation, 8:10CV187. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20190819c71 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant's unopposed motion for approval of supersedeas bond and stay of execution of judgment, Filing No. 970. A copy of the executed bond is attached to the motion as Exhibit A. The defendant represents to the Court that plaintiff Exmark Manufacturing Co., Inc. does not oppose this motion, and has agreed to both the form and amount of the bond. Under the Federal Rules, a party is entitled to a stay of
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on defendant's unopposed motion for approval of supersedeas bond and stay of execution of judgment, Filing No. 970. A copy of the executed bond is attached to the motion as Exhibit A.

The defendant represents to the Court that plaintiff Exmark Manufacturing Co., Inc. does not oppose this motion, and has agreed to both the form and amount of the bond. Under the Federal Rules, a party is entitled to a stay of a monetary judgment as a matter of right if a supersedeas bond is posted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that

1. The defendant's motion for approval of supersedeas bond and a stay of execution of the judgment (Filing No. 970) is granted.

2. The supersedeas bond attached as Exhibit A to the motion (Filing No. 970, Ex. A) is approved.

3. Execution on the monetary judgment is stayed pending the appeal of the action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer