Rand v. Stanosheck, 8:18CV481. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190830c03
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2019
Summary: AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (Filing No. 41.) The motion is granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply: 1) The Pretrial Conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 24, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.,
Summary: AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (Filing No. 41.) The motion is granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply: 1) The Pretrial Conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 24, 2020 at 11:00 a.m., a..
More
AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (Filing No. 41.) The motion is granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply:
1) The Pretrial Conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on April 24, 2020 at 11:00 a.m., and will be conducted by internet/telephonic conferencing. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (If counsel wishes to appear in person, counsel must contact chambers requesting permission to do so. Before contacting chambers to request such relief, counsel shall confer regarding the issue.) The parties' proposed Pretrial Conference Order and Exhibit List(s) must be emailed to bazis@ned.uscourts.gov, in Word format, by 3:00 p.m. on April 21, 2020. The trial date in this matter is canceled and will be reset at the telephonic status conference or at the pretrial conference.
2) The telephonic conference to discuss the status of case progression, the parties' interest in settlement and trial setting is rescheduled with the undersigned magistrate judge to February 10, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. (Filing No. 21).
3) Motions to compel discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 must be filed by December 20, 2019.
Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties' dispute.
4) The deadlines for identifying expert witnesses expected to testify at the trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s): December 13, 2019
For the defendant(s): January 17, 2020
Rebuttal: January30, 2020
5) The deadlines for complete expert disclosures1 for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s): December 13, 2019
For the defendant(s): January 17, 2020
Plaintiff(s)' rebuttal: January 30, 2020
6) The deposition deadline is February 28, 2020.
a. The maximum number of depositions that may be taken by the plaintiffs as a group and the defendants as a group is 15.
b. Depositions will be limited by Rule 30(d)(1).
7) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is February 28, 2020.
8) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is February 28, 2020.
9) Motions in limine shall be filed seven days before the pretrial conference. It is not the normal practice to hold hearings on motions in limine or to rule on them prior to the first day of trial. Counsel should plan accordingly.
10) The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order.
11) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge, including all requests for changes of trial dates. Such requests will not be considered absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require that additional time be allowed.
FootNotes
1. While treating medical and mental health care providers are generally not considered "specially retained experts," not all their opinions relate to the care and treatment of a patient. Their opinion testimony is limited to what is stated within their treatment documentation. As to each such expert, any opinions which are not stated within that expert's treatment records and reports must be separately and timely disclosed.
Source: Leagle
