United States v. Carranza, 8:19CR183. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190930d68
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the magistrate judge's 1 Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 54) recommending the Court deny defendant Juan Carranza's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 39). The magistrate judge made that recommendation on September 10, 2019, after a hearing. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen days to object. Neither party has objected, or otherwise responded, to the findings and recommendation.
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the magistrate judge's 1 Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 54) recommending the Court deny defendant Juan Carranza's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 39). The magistrate judge made that recommendation on September 10, 2019, after a hearing. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen days to object. Neither party has objected, or otherwise responded, to the findings and recommendation. S..
More
ORDER
ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the magistrate judge's1 Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 54) recommending the Court deny defendant Juan Carranza's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 39). The magistrate judge made that recommendation on September 10, 2019, after a hearing. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen days to object. Neither party has objected, or otherwise responded, to the findings and recommendation.
Section 636(b)(1) requires the Court conduct a de novo review only when a party timely objects. The absence of a timely objection "eliminates not only the need for de novo review, but any review by the district court." Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 553 F.3d 609, 619-20 (8th Cir. 2009); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(a), (b)(2) (explaining the failure to timely object waives the right to review); NECrimR 59.2(a), (e). Because the Court has not received any objections,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 54) are accepted. Any objections are deemed waived.
2. Defendant Juan Carranza's Motion to Suppress (Filing No. 39) is denied.
FootNotes
1. The Honorable Susan M. Bazis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Source: Leagle
