United States v. Reese, 4:17CR3006. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20191106d82
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The government has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 39). As explained by counsel, Government cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Government's unopposed motion to continue the status conference, (Filing No. 39), is granted. 2) A status co
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The government has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 39). As explained by counsel, Government cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Government's unopposed motion to continue the status conference, (Filing No. 39), is granted. 2) A status con..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
The government has moved to continue Defendant's status hearing. (Filing No. 39). As explained by counsel, Government cannot attend the hearing at the currently scheduled date and time. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Government's unopposed motion to continue the status conference, (Filing No. 39), is granted.
2) A status conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge at 1:30 p.m. on December 3, 2019 Unless the court later orders otherwise, the defendant may, but need not attend the status conference. If the defendant attends, the status conference will be held in Courtroom 2, Federal Building, 100 Centennial Mall North, Lincoln, Nebraska. If the defendant does not attend, the status conference will be held in chambers.
3) The court finds that the time between today's date and December 3, 2019 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act because although counsel have been diligent, additional time is needed to adequately review this case and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
