United States v. Smith, 8:19CR231. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20191119b50
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [27]. Counsel was recently appointed and needs additional time to review discovery in this matter and to meet and discuss with defendant. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [27] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for December 16, 2019, is continued to January 21, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [27]. Counsel was recently appointed and needs additional time to review discovery in this matter and to meet and discuss with defendant. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [27] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for December 16, 2019, is continued to January 21, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the c..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [27]. Counsel was recently appointed and needs additional time to review discovery in this matter and to meet and discuss with defendant. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [27] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for December 16, 2019, is continued to January 21, 2020.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and January 21, 2020, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
