United States v. Gills, 8:18CR249. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20191120d66
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the United States of America's Motion for Rule 17.1 Hearing. (Filing No. 43.) The United States was represented by Donald Kleine. Curtis Gills was not present but was represented by Karen Vervaecke. Cardella Gills was not present but was represented by Karen Shanahan. Based on the discussions with counsel today, the court finds that the trial, currently set for December 10, 2019, should be cancelled. Defense couns
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the United States of America's Motion for Rule 17.1 Hearing. (Filing No. 43.) The United States was represented by Donald Kleine. Curtis Gills was not present but was represented by Karen Vervaecke. Cardella Gills was not present but was represented by Karen Shanahan. Based on the discussions with counsel today, the court finds that the trial, currently set for December 10, 2019, should be cancelled. Defense counse..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the United States of America's Motion for Rule 17.1 Hearing. (Filing No. 43.) The United States was represented by Donald Kleine. Curtis Gills was not present but was represented by Karen Vervaecke. Cardella Gills was not present but was represented by Karen Shanahan.
Based on the discussions with counsel today, the court finds that the trial, currently set for December 10, 2019, should be cancelled. Defense counsel needs time to finalize some issues with the case in order to determine how to proceed. Accordingly, and with the consent of counsel for the parties,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The trial date currently set for December 10, 2019 is cancelled.
2. A status conference will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on February 19, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the progression of the case and possibly set a trial date.
3. The Court further finds that in the interest of justice, the time between November 13, 2019 and February 19, 2020 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because additional time is needed to review discovery and confer with the defendants before setting a progression schedule to final resolution. See, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7).
Source: Leagle
