Kirk v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, 4:18CV3125. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20191210d50
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial and Trial dates. ( Filing No. 37. ) The motion is granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply: 1) The trial and pretrial conference scheduled in this matter are canceled and will not be reset at this
Summary: AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial and Trial dates. ( Filing No. 37. ) The motion is granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply: 1) The trial and pretrial conference scheduled in this matter are canceled and will not be reset at this t..
More
AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial and Trial dates. (Filing No. 37.) The motion is granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the provisions of the Court's earlier final progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply:
1) The trial and pretrial conference scheduled in this matter are canceled and will not be reset at this time. A telephonic status conference to discuss case progression, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on April 9, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference.
2) The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order.
3) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge. Such requests will not be considered absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require that additional time be allowed.
Source: Leagle
