United States v. Dortch, 4:18-CR-3034. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200116d81
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER * NUNC PRO TUNC * JOHN M. GERRARD , Chief District Judge . The defendant objects (filing 197) to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 175) recommending that his motion to dismiss (filing 150), motion to exclude evidence (filing 151) and motion to suppress (filing 152) be denied. The Court conducted a de novo review of the motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and legal analysis. The
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER * NUNC PRO TUNC * JOHN M. GERRARD , Chief District Judge . The defendant objects (filing 197) to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 175) recommending that his motion to dismiss (filing 150), motion to exclude evidence (filing 151) and motion to suppress (filing 152) be denied. The Court conducted a de novo review of the motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and legal analysis. The C..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER * NUNC PRO TUNC *
JOHN M. GERRARD, Chief District Judge.
The defendant objects (filing 197) to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 175) recommending that his motion to dismiss (filing 150), motion to exclude evidence (filing 151) and motion to suppress (filing 152) be denied. The Court conducted a de novo review of the motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and legal analysis. The Court therefore finds the defendant's objection to be without merit, and will adopt the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation (filing 175) are adopted.
2. The defendant's objection (filing 197) is overruled.
3. The defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 150) is denied.
4. The defendant's motion to exclude evidence (filing 151) is denied.
5. The defendant's motion to suppress (filing 152) is denied.
Source: Leagle
