United States v. Hird, 4:19CR3038. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200124e53
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2020
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . Defendant has filed a motion challenging this court's "Personal and Territorial" jurisdiction. (Filing No. 37). Substantively, the pending motion is the same as Defendant's prior motion challenging personal jurisdiction. (See Filing Nos. 27 and 28). As previously stated, (see Filing No. 31), because the motion is frivolous, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's request for a hearing is denied. 2) Defendant's renewed jurisdictional challenge, (Fili
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . Defendant has filed a motion challenging this court's "Personal and Territorial" jurisdiction. (Filing No. 37). Substantively, the pending motion is the same as Defendant's prior motion challenging personal jurisdiction. (See Filing Nos. 27 and 28). As previously stated, (see Filing No. 31), because the motion is frivolous, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's request for a hearing is denied. 2) Defendant's renewed jurisdictional challenge, (Filin..
More
ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion challenging this court's "Personal and Territorial" jurisdiction. (Filing No. 37). Substantively, the pending motion is the same as Defendant's prior motion challenging personal jurisdiction. (See Filing Nos. 27 and 28).
As previously stated, (see Filing No. 31), because the motion is frivolous,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's request for a hearing is denied.
2) Defendant's renewed jurisdictional challenge, (Filing No. 37), is denied.
Source: Leagle
