United States v. Dixon, 8:19cr323. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200218d15
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [22]. The parties are working toward a resolution but seek additional time to conclude their negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [22] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for February 25, 2020, is continued to March 31, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A),
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [22]. The parties are working toward a resolution but seek additional time to conclude their negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [22] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for February 25, 2020, is continued to March 31, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [22]. The parties are working toward a resolution but seek additional time to conclude their negotiations. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [22] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for February 25, 2020, is continued to March 31, 2020.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 31, 2020, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
