United States v. Johnson, 8:20CR21. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200219f91
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PRETRIAL MOTIONS [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by March 19, 2020. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PRETRIAL MOTIONS [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or befor
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PRETRIAL MOTIONS [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by March 19, 2020. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PRETRIAL MOTIONS [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PRETRIAL MOTIONS [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by March 19, 2020.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR FILING PRETRIAL MOTIONS [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before March 19, 2020.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 18, 2020, and March 19, 2020, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
