United States v. Morales, 8:19CR279. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200318c29
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [30]. Based on the reasons set forth in the motion, the court finds good cause has been shown and the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [30] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for March 25, 2020 is continued to July 7, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the co
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [30]. Based on the reasons set forth in the motion, the court finds good cause has been shown and the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [30] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for March 25, 2020 is continued to July 7, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the cou..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [30]. Based on the reasons set forth in the motion, the court finds good cause has been shown and the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue [30] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for March 25, 2020 is continued to July 7, 2020.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 7, 2020, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
