United States v. Goodwin, 8:20CR83. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200320948
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Government's JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL PROGRESSION ORDER [29]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The government will be given an approximate 20-day extension to produce Rule 16 discovery to both defendants. Defendants will be given an approximate 45-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by May 26, 2020. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Government's JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSI
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Government's JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL PROGRESSION ORDER [29]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The government will be given an approximate 20-day extension to produce Rule 16 discovery to both defendants. Defendants will be given an approximate 45-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by May 26, 2020. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Government's JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSIO..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Government's JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL PROGRESSION ORDER [29]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The government will be given an approximate 20-day extension to produce Rule 16 discovery to both defendants. Defendants will be given an approximate 45-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by May 26, 2020.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Government's JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL PROGRESSION ORDER [29] is granted. Rule 16 discovery shall be provided to defendants Brealon J. Goodwin, and Tristen A. Coleman, on or before April 10, 2020. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before May 26, 2020.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between March 19, 2020, and May 26, 2020, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
