U.S. v. PAFFORD, 10-cr-53-04-JD. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Number: infdco20120113a45
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH A. DiCLERICO, Jr., District Judge. The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial and cancel plea hearing scheduled for January 17, 2011,(document no. 112) filed by defendant Pafford, granted in the interest of justice there being an outstanding motion to supress which is in the process of being scheduled, and a transportation issue, which must be resolved, as to one defendant, due to failure of federal statute to make explicit provision for paying return cost for an indigent def
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH A. DiCLERICO, Jr., District Judge. The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial and cancel plea hearing scheduled for January 17, 2011,(document no. 112) filed by defendant Pafford, granted in the interest of justice there being an outstanding motion to supress which is in the process of being scheduled, and a transportation issue, which must be resolved, as to one defendant, due to failure of federal statute to make explicit provision for paying return cost for an indigent defe..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH A. DiCLERICO, Jr., District Judge.
The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial and cancel plea hearing scheduled for January 17, 2011,(document no. 112) filed by defendant Pafford, granted in the interest of justice there being an outstanding motion to supress which is in the process of being scheduled, and a transportation issue, which must be resolved, as to one defendant, due to failure of federal statute to make explicit provision for paying return cost for an indigent defendant. As co-defendant Blank assents to this continuance, trial is continued as to both defendants to the two-week period beginning March 20, 2012, 9:30 a.m. Defendant Pafford's plea will be rescheduled.
Defendant Pafford shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10 days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
