U.S. v. MARTINEZ-AMADOR, 13-cr-18-01-JL. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Number: infdco20130628c10
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Chief District Judge. The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no. 21) filed by defendant is granted; Final Pretrial is rescheduled to August 22, 2013 at 2:30 PM; Trial is continued to the two-week period beginning September 4, 2013, 9:30 AM. In addition to various filing deadlines contained in the local rules, the parties shall also file any in limine motions no later than ten (10) days prior to the final pretrial conference. Objections to motions in
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Chief District Judge. The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no. 21) filed by defendant is granted; Final Pretrial is rescheduled to August 22, 2013 at 2:30 PM; Trial is continued to the two-week period beginning September 4, 2013, 9:30 AM. In addition to various filing deadlines contained in the local rules, the parties shall also file any in limine motions no later than ten (10) days prior to the final pretrial conference. Objections to motions in ..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, Chief District Judge.
The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no. 21) filed by defendant is granted; Final Pretrial is rescheduled to August 22, 2013 at 2:30 PM; Trial is continued to the two-week period beginning September 4, 2013, 9:30 AM. In addition to various filing deadlines contained in the local rules, the parties shall also file any in limine motions no later than ten (10) days prior to the final pretrial conference. Objections to motions in limine shall be filed no later than three (3) days prior to the final pretrial conference.
Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10 days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
