Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WIDI v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 14-cv-160-SM. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire Number: infdco20140808654 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER STEVEN J. McAULIFFE, District Judge. After due consideration of the plaintiff's objection and supplemental objection filed on July 11 and July 17, respectively, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 24, 2014, for the reasons set forth therein. Plaintiff's Privacy Act claims (Claims 1 and 2), First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Hastings (Claim 6), and First Amendment retaliation and supervisory liability claims
More

ORDER

STEVEN J. McAULIFFE, District Judge.

After due consideration of the plaintiff's objection and supplemental objection filed on July 11 and July 17, respectively, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 24, 2014, for the reasons set forth therein.

Plaintiff's Privacy Act claims (Claims 1 and 2), First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Hastings (Claim 6), and First Amendment retaliation and supervisory liability claims against defendants Hogan, Langley, Mullins and Tatum (Claims 7 and 8) are hereby dismissed. Defendants Federal Bureau of Prisons, United State Probation and Pretrial Services, L. Hogan, FNU Langley, and Scott Hastings are also dismissed from this case. The case will proceed on plaintiff's Claims 3 through 5 and the remaining defendants D. Hudson, FNU Gaunyea, David Salamy, FNU Glue, Dan Sullivan and Y. Matteau.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer