Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PAPINEAU v. EDMARK, 15-cv-340-SM. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire Number: infdco20151231916 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Richard Papineau has filed three motions seeking to voluntarily withdraw this action (doc. nos. 22, 26, and 27). Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Papineau's requests to voluntarily dismiss this matter should thus be granted, and the action should be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). 1 Further, plaintiff's motion (doc. no. 13) seeking an order directing that t
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Richard Papineau has filed three motions seeking to voluntarily withdraw this action (doc. nos. 22, 26, and 27). Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Papineau's requests to voluntarily dismiss this matter should thus be granted, and the action should be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).1 Further, plaintiff's motion (doc. no. 13) seeking an order directing that the defendants' assets be frozen until this matter is concluded should be denied as moot.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See Garayalde-Rijos v. Mun. of Carolina, 747 F.3d 15, 21-22 (1st Cir. 2014).

FootNotes


1. By order issued this date, the court withdraws its two previous Report and Recommendations (doc. nos. 19 and 21).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer