Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sonia v. Hanks, 14-cv-524-LM. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. New Hampshire Number: infdco20160419c51 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is prisoner Brett Sonia's motion (doc. no. 41), in which she: (1) states her intention to file a new action in this court (concerning events that occurred after judgment entered in the above-captioned case); (2) seeks additional time to file pleadings relating to the new claims; and (3) requests an injunction directing New Hampshire State Prison officials to provide her with access to her eyeglasses and leg
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is prisoner Brett Sonia's motion (doc. no. 41), in which she: (1) states her intention to file a new action in this court (concerning events that occurred after judgment entered in the above-captioned case); (2) seeks additional time to file pleadings relating to the new claims; and (3) requests an injunction directing New Hampshire State Prison officials to provide her with access to her eyeglasses and legal materials. In an Order issued this date, the court has granted Sonia's request to open a new civil rights case asserting claims arising after judgment entered in this case, and denied Sonia's request to file additional pleadings in this case, as this case is closed.

The district judge has referred Sonia's request for preliminary injunctive relief to this magistrate judge for a recommendation as to disposition. Sonia's request for a preliminary injunction should be denied in this matter, as this case is closed. The denial should be without prejudice, however, to Sonia's ability to file a motion for preliminary injunctive relief on any appropriate basis in the newly-opened case.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, Sonia's motion (doc. no. 41), to the extent it contains a request for preliminary injunctive relief, should be denied. Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See Garayalde-Rijos v. Mun. of Carolina, 747 F.3d 15, 21-22 (1st Cir. 2014).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer