TANNEN v. TANNEN, 31 A.3d 621 (2011)
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Number: innjco20111208286
Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Messano's opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248 , 3 A.3d 1229 (2010). For affirmance —Chief Justice RABNER, and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, and PATTERSON—6. Opposed —None. Not Participating —Judge WEFING (temporarily assigned)—1.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Messano's opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 416 N.J.Super. 248, 3 A.3d 1229 (2010).
For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER, and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, and PATTERSON—6.
Opposed—None.
Not Participating—Judge WEFING (temporarily assigned)—1.
Source: Leagle
