Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

STATE v. KALTNER, 41 A.3d 736 (2012)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey Number: innjco20120501275 Visitors: 31
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 420 N.J.Super. 524 , 22 A.3d 77 (2011). For affirmance —Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, PATTERSON and WEFING (temporarily assigned)—6. Opposed —None.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 420 N.J.Super. 524, 22 A.3d 77 (2011).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, PATTERSON and WEFING (temporarily assigned)—6.

Opposed—None.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer