Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GAFFNEY v. JETBLUE AIRLINES, INC., 10-1713 (PGS). (2012)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20120405891 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PETER G. SHERIDAN, District Judge. WHEREAS on April 5, 2010, plaintiffs Anna Gaffney and Edward Gaffney (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed a complaint against JetBlue Airlines, Inc.'s ("JetBlue"); and WHEREAS Plaintiffs' complaint states that on December 8, 2008, Ms. Gaffney tripped and fell over an unattended wheelchair at the boarding area of Gate D6 of the Fort Meyers International Airport in Fort Meyers, Florida and that as a result of the fall, Ms. Gaffney was severel
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETER G. SHERIDAN, District Judge.

WHEREAS on April 5, 2010, plaintiffs Anna Gaffney and Edward Gaffney (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed a complaint against JetBlue Airlines, Inc.'s ("JetBlue"); and

WHEREAS Plaintiffs' complaint states that on December 8, 2008, Ms. Gaffney tripped and fell over an unattended wheelchair at the boarding area of Gate D6 of the Fort Meyers International Airport in Fort Meyers, Florida and that as a result of the fall, Ms. Gaffney was severely injured; and

WHEREAS Plaintiffs claim that Ms. Gaffney's injuries were caused by JetBlue's negligence; and

WHEREAS Defendants moved for summary judgment [Docket Entry No. 25], arguing, among other things, that Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proving that Ms. Gaffney's injuries were caused by JetBlue's negligence, see Opp'n Br. 13-16 (citing Vuocolo v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co., 473 A.2d 196 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990); and

WHEREAS Plaintiffs have not produced any evidence from medical doctors that Ms. Gaffney's injuries were caused by or related to her fall as opposed to her preexisting conditions; and

WHEREAS fact discovery in this matter was closed as of April 8, 2011 [Docket Entry No. 22];

IT IS on this 26th day of March, 2012,

ORDERED that JetBlue's motion for summary judgment [Docket Entry No. 25] is granted; and

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer