U.S. v. MARTINEZ, 03-230. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20120613b63
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, District Judge. A motion to terminate defendant's period of supervised release having been tiled in this matter; the United States of America (by Andrew Kogan, Assistant United States Attorney, appearing) having opposed the motion; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties; and for good cause shown; It is on this 11th day of June 2012 ORDERED that, after considering the factors set forth in 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)
Summary: ORDER KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, District Judge. A motion to terminate defendant's period of supervised release having been tiled in this matter; the United States of America (by Andrew Kogan, Assistant United States Attorney, appearing) having opposed the motion; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties; and for good cause shown; It is on this 11th day of June 2012 ORDERED that, after considering the factors set forth in 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(..
More
ORDER
KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, District Judge.
A motion to terminate defendant's period of supervised release having been tiled in this matter; the United States of America (by Andrew Kogan, Assistant United States Attorney, appearing) having opposed the motion; the Court having considered the submissions of the parties; and for good cause shown;
It is on this 11th day of June 2012
ORDERED that, after considering the factors set forth in 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6), and (a)(7), and in light of the fact that defendant has not presented the Court with changed or extraordinary circumstances, the motion to terminate defendant's period of supervised release is hereby DENIED.
Source: Leagle
